<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
      <title>Aperture Related - Aperture Blog Community</title>
      <link>http://community.theapertureblog.com/categories/aperture-related/feed.rss</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 12 16:03:40 -0700</pubDate>
         <description>Aperture Related - Aperture Blog Community</description>
   <language>en-CA</language>
   <atom:link href="/discussions/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
   <item>
      <title>Library in a external Thunderbolt HD. Speeds up Things? Is it worth it?</title>
      <link>http://community.theapertureblog.com/discussion/20/library-in-a-external-thunderbolt-hd.-speeds-up-things-is-it-worth-it</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:06:10 -0700</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>doctorsoto</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20@/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A great advantage of Aperture is to have different libraries in different places.<div>Thunderbolt HD are expensive, should we consider to upgrade to this drives? &nbsp;Cheap USB Hard Drives that slow? Tell us your experience</div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Do you update old files with the newer RAW processing?</title>
      <link>http://community.theapertureblog.com/discussion/18/do-you-update-old-files-with-the-newer-raw-processing</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:23:20 -0700</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Snaptophobic</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18@/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I have several thousand images in my library (I know, lightweight or what!), many of which date back to when I got my first DSLR in 2006.&nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>I am quite happy with the processing I did on those images back in the day. Aperture kindly doesn't impose change by forcing me to reprocess them, which is good. However, I wonder whether I should be reprocessing any of them.</div><div><br /></div><div>What do you think? Reprocess older images I'm happy with using the new RAW processing? Or leave well alone?</div><div><br /></div><div>I realise reprocessing often doesn't make any material change to what I did back then, but it's something I'm always wary of.</div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>How Long Can Aperture Go Without Being Updated</title>
      <link>http://community.theapertureblog.com/discussion/16/how-long-can-aperture-go-without-being-updated</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 09:09:18 -0700</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16@/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Aperture 3.x is currently the longest the software has gone without a major update. Since then there's now been two major releases of Lightroom. I'm wondering how long people are willing to go with Aperture not being updated before they begin to get worried, or decide to switch? This isn't about lightroom or anything else, but more about Apple's seeming (at the moment anyway) neglect of Aperture? What do you think?]]></description>
   </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
